In their day, and to some extent still, Thelonious Monk and John
Coltrane were two of the most controversial figures in post-war jazz.
Both have had their ardent admirers and fierce critics since time
immemorial. The consensus today seems to respect them both as pioneers
who pushed the art form into theretofore unchartered territory, while
the aesthetic and emotional appeal of their music remains as open to
debate as ever. It is all the more surprising, then, that the two
hardly ever played and recorded together. Aside from a double set of
their Carnegie Hall concert from 1957, released to great fanfare four
years ago, and a barely audible bootleg from the Five Spot from around
the same time,
The Complete Riverside Recordings
(Riverside, 2006) is the only other surviving document of their
collaboration, and purportedly the only one recorded in a studio.
Recorded
by Orrin Keepnews, then owner and producer at Riverside, over three
sessions in the spring and summer of 1957, the set promises more than
it delivers, but almost makes up for that by other unexpected
revelations. This is an archival document, not a record to be listened
to for pleasure. False starts, aborted takes, and even studio banter
are plentiful. Whether you consider that to be valuable or distracting
will depend on your perspective, of course. Suffice it to say this is a
record to study, not to float away to into some magical jazz universe.
Far more important, however, is the personnel. Monk, Coltrane's senior
by nine years and the undisputed leader of these sessions, had brought
in a septet (!) which included, in addition to Coltrane, Art Blakey on
drums and Wilbur Ware on bass, the now forgotten Ray Copeland on
trumpet, Gigi Gryce on alto and, unbelievable though it sounds, Coleman
Hawkins on second tenor.
Or perhaps not so unbelievable -
Hawkins was Monk's first steady employer in the late 1940s, and the
quintessential swing-era saxophonist had done an amazing job late in
his career keeping up with the bebop kids without sacrificing his
trademark style. So the most obvious reason the recording is valuable
is the opportunity to hear not the interplay between Monk and Coltrane,
but the contrast between Coltrane and Hawkins. In fact, the first track
to offer this - Gryce's Blues for Tomorrow
-- does not feature any of Monk's piano at all (he is reported to have
fallen asleep and wheeled out on an equipment cart, but Keepnews had to
use up the studio time he had paid for). Coltrane solos first, followed
immediately by Hawkins. Coltrane was on the cusp of his "sheets of
sound" period in 1957, but here he betrays little of what was to come a
couple of years later. His tone is much less edgy than what most
listeners are used to, but the solo as a whole is unfocused, and
already sounds unnecessarily busy. Hawkins wins hands-down - his
statement is swinging, well structured, played with enough energy to
keep up with the rest of the band but without compromising clarity.
Further comparison between the two is available on Ruby, My Dear -
Hawk and Trane get one version each. Coltrane acquits himself better
here - his solo is measured, relaxed and very "inside" (the same can be
said of his solo on Epistrophy), while Hawkins pulls off a few boppy
runs in homage to his session mates.
Behind all of this, or some
of it at any rate, is Monk. He actually solos very little, preferring
to play the role of glue, but when he finally does on Epistrophy and Well, You Needn't
in the middle of Disc Two, it is very effective. His solos are firmly
based on the themes, he does not show off, and where he uses the
dissonance for which he was supposed to have been famous, he balances
it perfectly with space - the stranger the intervals, the fewer notes
he uses. His comping, too, is much in the same vein, though it is worth
considering the fact that he plays much more behind some of the horns
than others, and the one that gets short thrift is Coltrane. Whether it
was a clash of two intense musical personalities, or a simple lack of
familiarity with one another's styles, we will never know. Suffice it
to say that Monk lays out a lot, and when he does not, as on Trinkle, Tinkle and, to a lesser extent, Nutty
(he starts but seems to give up after a while), his playing behind
Coltrane is far from adventurous. It sounds as if the two couldn't
quite find a shared musical language, and Monk, being the more
experienced of the two at the time, simply got out of the way.
His playing behind Gryce, by contrast, whether sparse, as on the short version of Epistrophy, or more dense, as on Well, You Needn't,
is always appropriate. It really seems that of the bunch, Hawkins
included, Monk is the most comfortable with Gryce, and in general, it
would not be an overstatement to say that Gryce is the real discovery
of the record. Boppy, but without the nervous jitter of Charlie Parker,
he develops his solos thoughtfully and has a good feel for the tune and
his accompanists. Definitely on this reviewer's list to explore further.
Whether Complete Riverside Recordings
is essential will depend on your approach. For an historian of 1950s
jazz, it is an indispensable document. For the rest, it tantalizes with
possibilities while leaving us with little that is truly satisfying,
while at the same time suggesting many areas for further exploration.
Note: This review was cross-posted at http://liquoricepizza.blogspot.com/
comments (0)
you must be logged in to comment